Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Wes Brown

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Margus Mägi

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Presenter

Time

Notes

Review Action Items

5 min

Sector Survey

Wes Brown

5 min

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NCBTHZT

Add some context before the first question. Why are we doing this, how will this be used, make a webpage in the GovStack explaining the exercise and invite the community to participate.

Move to the same service as is being used for the Women in GovStack survey (reach out to Yolanda for info)

Get it approved
Launch the campaign

Proposed 2023 Roadmap

Wes Brown

20 min

2023 Roadmap

Questions

  • Margus: Should the SDG Digital Framework be part of some kind of associated documents similar to the Playbook and GERA? The SDG digital framework document is similar to the Playbook and GERA. Margus suggests that the SDG document, Playbook, and GERA should complement each other, potentially with revisions and collaborative efforts must be established.

  • BB waves are currently in progress. There will be a feedback round until August, followed by another version public release, hopefully by September.
    In the upcoming weeks, we will determine how Workflows should be developed, whether as a separate entity or integrated with existing processes.

Version Numbering

10 min

Potential Options:

Simple Numbering: 1, 2, 3, etc

Semantic: 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.0.1

Date: 2023.05, 2023.09

Date Numeric: 2023.1, 2023.2

Date Quarterly: 23Q2, 24Q1

Comments

  • Steve: Semantic versioning doesn’t really apply for this type of product; am fine moving away from it. Suggest Date Numeric or Date Quarterly

  • Jaume: We may want to get on a specific cadence for publication

  • Pawel: It may be helpful to ensure that the BB also references which overall GovStack publication it is included with

  • Pawel: We need publication mascots!!! Possibly inspired by Chinese yearly animals according to Sheramn. Margus finds this politically delicate matter.

Priority Use Case Sectors

Wes Brown

5 min

Next Steps

  1. Get feedback from survey

    1. Try to identify use cases that will highlight the value of the GovStack approach

  2. Identify potential use cases in each sector

    1. Find volunteers to analyze sectors and identify potential use cases

  3. Decide on which use cases to prioritize for the next (post-1.0) publication

  4. Present use case in GC get it approved

  5. Launch the campaign

Next Meeting

GovStack UI (May-31)

Jaume DUBOIS

Possible Mobile App Features - Jaume DUBOIS wants tod start discussion about GS Wallet for ID. Wes Brown The next step is to determine how to fund the wallet work and evaluate needed capacity. Jaume will create slides to outline the possibilities and present them at the May 31 meeting. He will also provide a briefing on the Togo meeting.

Togo Feedback (May-31)

Jaume DUBOIS

Meeting Note Rotation

GIZ, Estonia (for GIZ), Dial, ITU

...

  •  Wes Brown track work for Release (Publication) Notes to go with the 1.0 publication
  •  Wes Brown to set up discussion (on GC?) around documents like GERA. These should likely not be considered part of the core “products” but need to find out where they fit
  •  Jaume DUBOIS to create a few slides to document ideas for a GovStack mobile app and

...

  • and

...

Roadmap: Wes: Waves are in progress. After v1 there is feedback round till august. Another version public hopefully by September. in next weeks we ill figure out how Workflows should be developing. Is it separate thing or what to do with these.
SDG digital framework document - no different from Playbook or others (Margus). SDG document and PLaybook and GERA should compliment each other. Should it have revision and collaborative effort on it.

Exchange:

Version numbering: which version of numbering we should use for published documentation? Steve: Semantic versioning we should move away and move towards date quarterly version. Wes: This versioning would be on the general level and all subversion will be mentioned under this. Jaume:

[16:46] Paweł Gesek (Gość)

It would be helpful to tag all building versions with the respective publication version (they can keep their specific versions). IF you release GS 23.02 Payments 1, IM 1.2 which BB changes in it. Mascots could be introduced.

Sheramn: Chinese yearly animals…

2023 Roadmap

⤴ Decisions