Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Participants: Mark Mulobi, Margus Mägi, Vikash Madduri, Josephine Lusi 

Agenda Item 

Who 

Notes  

Meeting time 

Margus, Mark, Vikash 

We will keep the current meeting sessions at 10:00 am CET. 

AHFE Paper Submission 

Discussion 

Submissions on 1st Feb 

AHFE Papers Autor list 

AHFE Paper Template 

Nicholas to submit on behalf of DIAL, Josephine on behalf of ITU 

Margus: Is Nicholas still participating? 

Mark: No but he is able to contribute 

Margus: Shared feedback. Why do we compare EU GDPR with AU Data Policy Framework? Consider rewriting the outcomes. How and who should put new angles into the paper?  

We should compare other frameworks like interoperability, and data sharing policies & frameworks that have been set by various countries. 

Vikash: US has a framework 

Margus: We need to change the notion of the paper. Govt is not a private entity. They do not need to seek consent every time they perform an action such as data collection. If it is set in the law, data should be reused, from the population registry. If data is not available, seek consent from the citizens. 

-Lets pull out the GDPR. Instead we compare exiting principles and set best practice. 

Mark: Will this change the outcome? 

Margus: Not sure 

Mark: Any way that we can remedy the paper. 

Vikash: Resources to consider 

HIPAA- USA, PIPEDA-Canada, PDPA-Singapore may be useful 

GDPR- Please consider the list of favoring nations (11 or 12) of EU; that is unique! 

Margus: Let's have a call with Nicholas to discuss the paper 

Nele doesn’t want her name on the paper 

Mark will share with Nicholas points on the paper. 

AHFE Paper on OSS 

 

Vikash: On OSS the initial topic was there's not enough data. However, there are 669 existing policies. 

Changed the abstract & merged what GovStack is doing with SDGs 

There are existing notions by UN.  

J to confirm with Ingris if the new abstract is ok 

Margus: If govt buys a software it's an asset not OSS. In Estonia there is a legal conundrum to overcome on the physical aspect of the legality of OSS, would having laws on these be considered a workaround? 

Vikash: The table is not correct and Alika will check this. But there should be an issue rltd to clarity and ownership on OSS & non OSS software. 

Margus: Sentence on data might be misleading.  

Vikash: 

...