Page Comparison

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

...

Farina Owusu Nico Lueck Martha Vasquez Oleksii Danyliuk jarkkohyoty Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Artun Gürkan Priit Puru Jonas Bergmeier

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Recall team progress and identify pain points to improve

Discussion topics

...

✅ Action items

...

Issue
Action + Owner
1
Meeting minutes and meeting time
Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings
2
Communication between vendors and working groups
attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress
3
update our teams page regarding responsibility areas Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) 24 Mar 2023
4
overview of knowledge sharing possibilities could be set up and shared from general GovStack (onboarding page) Nico Lueck Farina Owusu 31 Mar 2023
5
Physical team event for socializing
set up confluence page for opportunities and share with teamMeelis Zujev (Deactivated) 21 Mar 2023
6
Feedback
if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews
share follow-up Mails/Slacks
7
Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure
claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) jarkkohyoty
8
provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results
9
BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud.
Oleksii Danyliuk collects thoughts on technical “issues” regarding this and schedules follow-up including Nico and Jukka 21 Mar 2023
10
11
Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?)
regular session like weekly standup could be established Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) 20 Mar 2023
where possible, move questions, chats and issues to GovStack #sandbox channel except for internal and organisational topics
12
Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a lot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time.
covered by → BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud Oleksii Danyliuk
13
(G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that
stays a desire for now → should be reviewed when feasible to introduce
14
Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual?
see #11
next retrospective https://www.funretrospectives.com/happiness-radar/ Jonas Bergmeier
15
More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes
asap!
16
that shared work results “sink in” after 1-2 exposures
relates to lack of constructive feedback
see #6
see #4

Versions Compared

Old Version 2

New Version Current

Key

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Discussion topics

✅ Action items

	Issue	Action + Owner
1	Meeting minutes and meeting time	Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings
2	Communication between vendors and working groups	attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress
3		update our teams page regarding responsibility areas Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) 24 Mar 2023
4		overview of knowledge sharing possibilities could be set up and shared from general GovStack (onboarding page) Nico Lueck Farina Owusu 31 Mar 2023
5	Physical team event for socializing	set up confluence page for opportunities and share with teamMeelis Zujev (Deactivated) 21 Mar 2023
6	Feedback	if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews share follow-up Mails/Slacks
7		Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) jarkkohyoty
8		provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results
9	BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud.	Oleksii Danyliuk collects thoughts on technical “issues” regarding this and schedules follow-up including Nico and Jukka 21 Mar 2023
10
11	Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?)	regular session like weekly standup could be established Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) 20 Mar 2023 where possible, move questions, chats and issues to GovStack #sandbox channel except for internal and organisational topics
12	Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a lot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time.	covered by → BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud Oleksii Danyliuk
13	(G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that	stays a desire for now → should be reviewed when feasible to introduce
14	Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual?	see #11 next retrospective https://www.funretrospectives.com/happiness-radar/ Jonas Bergmeier
15	More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes	asap!
16	that shared work results “sink in” after 1-2 exposures	relates to lack of constructive feedback see #6 see #4