Page Comparison

10 min

Building Permit Wireframes testing outcomes

Artun GürkanJonas Bergmeier

5 external testing + 2 internal testing
User Testing - Takeaway
Action items were created for way forward
wireframes can be followed:

https://www.figma.com/file/Nb5YWT3QTvwTZl3MyJXzi7/Construction-Permit-Use-Case?type=design&node-id=1185%3A24407&mode=design&t=AvfUrTXUGxb6xFyG-1

10 min

Payment BB- integration , Initial Documentation Structure for USCT, Local Storage Provider obj->tree integration.

Vladislav Todorov

Payment BB integration toward sandbox and USCT

There were presented 3 endpoints witch meet specification 2.0
Even thou presented API were modified from initial workflow Sandbox can still use API with some reservation (bend the Use case). Satja Q: does difficulites with asyncronous calls are resoleved? – NO, but we can work around. There is addressed severel question toward BB-provider to be answered.

5 min

ID-BB integration

Oleksii Danyliuk Vasil Kolev jarkkohyoty

5 min

IM-BB documentation and deployment into Sandbox

jarkkohyoty

5 min

FE documentation and new project preparation

Priit Puru

5 min

Sandbox infra adjustments

Tsvetomir Krumov

10 min

Documentation structure for Community building

Jonas Bergmeier Nico Lueck

https://govstack.gitbook.io/sandbox/
Structure for Sandbox documentation

5 min

Next sprint priorities

Vasil Kolev Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Nico Lueck

All relevant documentation from Confluence to Github/gitbook
BB integration continoues

How to align with Govstack next release with sandbox?