Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

...

Farina Owusu Nico Lueck Martha Vasquez Oleksii Danyliuk jarkkohyoty Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Artun Gürkan Priit Puru Jonas Bergmeier

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Recall team progress and identify pain points to improve

...

✅ Action items

Issue

Action + Owner

1

Meeting minutes and meeting time

(warning) Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings

2

Communication between vendors and working groups

(warning) attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress

3

4

  •   overview of knowledge sharing possibilities could be set up and shared from general GovStack (onboarding page) Nico Lueck Farina Owusu

5

Physical team event for socializing

6

Feedback

(warning) if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews
(warning) share follow-up Mails/Slacks

7

Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure

(warning) claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) jarkkohyoty

8

(warning) provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results

9

BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud.

  •  Oleksii Danyliuk collects thoughts on technical “issues” regarding this and schedules follow-up including Nico and Jukka

10

11

Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?)

(warning) where possible, move questions, chats and issues to GovStack #sandbox channel except for internal and organisational topics

12

Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a ot lot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time.

covered by → BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud Oleksii Danyliuk

13

(G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that

stays a desire for now → should be reviewed when feasible to introduce

14

Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual?

see #11

15

More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes

(smile) asap!

16

that shared work results “sink in” after 1-2 exposures

  • relates to lack of constructive feedback

(warning) see #6

(warning) see #4