\uD83D\uDDD3 Date
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
Farina Owusu Nico Lueck Martha Vasquez Oleksii Danyliuk jarkkohyoty Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Artun Gürkan Priit Puru Jonas Bergmeier
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
Recall team progress and identify pain points to improve
Discussion topics
https://www.figma.com/file/NSq8jV1utCasL5PSA8xsos/Retrospective?node-id=232%3A689&t=wDAqZ4lOeOn6tsrp-1
✅ Action items
Issue | Action + Owner |
---|---|
Meeting minutes and meeting time | Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings |
Communication between vendors and working groups | attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress |
| |
| |
Physical team event for socializing |
|
Feedback | if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews |
Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) jarkkohyoty | |
provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results | |
BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud. |
|
Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?) | |
Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a ot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time. | |
(G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that | |
Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual? | |
More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes | |
that shared work results “sink in” after 1-2 exposures |