Date
\uD83D\uDC65Â Participants
đź“ą Meeting Recording
Recording URL:
\uD83D\uDDE3Â Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Review Action Items | 5 min | ||
Sector Survey | 5 min | https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NCBTHZT Add some context before the first question. Why are we doing this, how will this be used, make a webpage in the GovStack explaining the exercise and invite the community to participate. Move to the same service as is being used for the Women in GovStack survey (reach out to Yolanda for info) Get it approved | |
Proposed 2023 Roadmap | 20 min | Questions
| |
Version Numbering | 10 min | Potential Options: Simple Numbering: 1, 2, 3, etc Semantic: 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.0.1 Date: 2023.05, 2023.09 Date Numeric: 2023.1, 2023.2 Date Quarterly: 23Q2, 24Q1 Comments
| |
Priority Use Case Sectors | 5 min | Next Steps
| |
Next Meeting | |||
GovStack UI (May-31) | Possible Mobile App Features | ||
Togo Feedback (May-31) | |||
Meeting Note Rotation | GIZ, Estonia (for GIZ), Dial, ITU |
âś…Â Action items
- Wes Brown track work for Release (Publication) Notes to go with the 1.0 publication
- Wes Brown to set up discussion (on GC?) around documents like GERA. These should likely not be considered part of the core “products” but need to find out where they fit
- Jaume DUBOIS to create a few slides to document ideas for a GovStack mobile app and
I will just make some random notes here and later structure:
Wallet: next step, we need to figure out how to fund the wallet work if we take this on. Capacity must be evaluated.. Jaume will make some slides what is could/should be… and will present at May 31 meeting. Also he will brief on Togo meeting.
Roadmap: Wes: Waves are in progress. After v1 there is feedback round till august. Another version public hopefully by September. in next weeks we ill figure out how Workflows should be developing. Is it separate thing or what to do with these.
SDG digital framework document - no different from Playbook or others (Margus). SDG document and PLaybook and GERA should compliment each other. Should it have revision and collaborative effort on it.
Exchange:
Version numbering: which version of numbering we should use for published documentation? Steve: Semantic versioning we should move away and move towards date quarterly version. Wes: This versioning would be on the general level and all subversion will be mentioned under this. Jaume:
[16:46] Paweł Gesek (Gość)
It would be helpful to tag all building versions with the respective publication version (they can keep their specific versions). IF you release GS 23.02 Payments 1, IM 1.2 which BB changes in it. Mascots could be introduced.
Sheramn: Chinese yearly animals…