Govstack SandBox Retrospective #4

 Date

Mar 14, 2023

 Participants

@Farina Owusu @Nico Lueck @Martha Vasquez @Oleksii Danyliuk @jarkkohyoty @Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) @Artun Gürkan @Priit Puru @Jonas Bergmeier

 Goals

Recall team progress and identify pain points to improve

 Discussion topics

https://www.figma.com/file/NSq8jV1utCasL5PSA8xsos/Retrospective?node-id=232%3A689&t=wDAqZ4lOeOn6tsrp-1

 

 Action items

 

Issue

Action + Owner

 

Issue

Action + Owner

1

Meeting minutes and meeting time

Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings

2

Communication between vendors and working groups

attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress

3

 

update our teams page regarding responsibility areas @Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) Mar 24, 2023

4

 

overview of knowledge sharing possibilities could be set up and shared from general GovStack (onboarding page) @Nico Lueck @Farina Owusu Mar 31, 2023

5

Physical team event for socializing

set up confluence page for opportunities and share with team@Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Mar 21, 2023

6

Feedback

if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews
share follow-up Mails/Slacks

7

 

Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure

claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) @Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) @jarkkohyoty

8

 

provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results

9

BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud.

@Oleksii Danyliuk collects thoughts on technical “issues” regarding this and schedules follow-up including Nico and Jukka Mar 21, 2023

10

 

 

11

Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?)

regular session like weekly standup could be established @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Mar 20, 2023

where possible, move questions, chats and issues to GovStack #sandbox channel except for internal and organisational topics

12

Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a lot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time.

covered by → BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud @Oleksii Danyliuk

13

(G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that

stays a desire for now → should be reviewed when feasible to introduce

14

Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual?

see #11

next retrospective https://www.funretrospectives.com/happiness-radar/ @Jonas Bergmeier

15

More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes

asap!

16

that shared work results “sink in” after 1-2 exposures

  • relates to lack of constructive feedback

see #6

see #4