Agenda

Presenter

Duration

Discussion

Review Mandate and Voting

@Steve Conrad

 10 minutes

Architecture Team

Update on review tasks

@Steve Conrad

10 minutes

Status of BB spec review, non-functional requirements review

Ramkumar:

• Started to work on ID BB spec, will start with other groups next week

• Suggest to divide specs between team to ensure we can do both a deep technical dive as well as across BBs to ensure consistency

Jukka

• Started on non-functional requirements

Next steps, assigning review tasks

• Ramkumar, Aare, Steve, Aleksander to divide BB specs (ID, Payments, IM, Workflow, Registration, Registries, Messaging, Scheduling, Consent)

  • Aleksander - Registration/Registries

  • Uwe - Registration/Registries (has done a previous review)

  • Ramkumar - ID, IM, Messaging

  • Aare - Scheduler, Payments

  • Steve - Consent, Workflow

• Jukka and Aare to review non-functional and security specs

  • Focus on SSO, auth, tokens

• Comments can go in Confluence: 1.0 Publication. Each BB should have a separate page - all reviewers to use the same page. Wes and Steve to develop a template/format.

Goal: Initial reviews done by March 31

Review Template: Non-Functional Requirements

Adaptors

@PSRAMKUMAR

30 minutes

Current approach for onboarding existing tools: https://govstack.gitbook.io/specification/architecture-and-nonfunctional-requirements/6-onboarding

Discussion on adaptors and phased approach

• Is the current approach correct? What is missing?

  • How do we do payload transformation and mapping of attributes?

• Updating the current documentation

• How can we create examples of this process? Identifying first products to work with and build adaptors for

Information Mediator

@PSRAMKUMAR

15 minutes

Testing with IM: https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-information-mediator/tree/main/examples/bb-openapi

Next steps/AOB

5 minutes

What should we prioritize?

Can we spin off small groups to work through specific tasks?