• In progress
  • Govstack SandBox Retrospective #4

    ย Date

    Mar 14, 2023

    ย Participants

    @Farina Owusu @Nico Lueck @Martha Vasquez @Oleksii Danyliuk @jarkkohyoty @Bert Viikmรคe (Deactivated) @Artun Gรผrkan @Priit Puru @Jonas Bergmeier

    ย Goals

    Recall team progress and identify pain points to improve

    ย Discussion topics

    https://www.figma.com/file/NSq8jV1utCasL5PSA8xsos/Retrospective?node-id=232%3A689&t=wDAqZ4lOeOn6tsrp-1

    ย 

    ย Action items

    ย 

    Issue

    Action + Owner

    ย 

    Issue

    Action + Owner

    1

    Meeting minutes and meeting time

    Timer should be handled by facilitator or meeting minutes taker for item-wise full/crowded meetings

    2

    Communication between vendors and working groups

    attend TC if you want to learn more about overall progress

    3

    ย 

    update our teams page regarding responsibility areas @Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) Mar 24, 2023

    4

    ย 

    overview of knowledge sharing possibilities could be set up and shared from general GovStack (onboarding page) @Nico Lueck @Farina Owusu Mar 31, 2023

    5

    Physical team event for socializing

    set up confluence page for opportunities and share with team@Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Mar 21, 2023

    6

    Feedback

    if possible, provide guiding questions for reviews
    share follow-up Mails/Slacks

    7

    ย 

    Technical matter: New GovStack architecture group might be a good new exposure

    claim slots on demand for technical reviews cc @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) @Heidi Kuum (Deactivated) @jarkkohyoty

    8

    ย 

    provide traceability for feedback if you expose work results

    9

    BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud.

    @Oleksii Danyliuk collects thoughts on technical โ€œissuesโ€ regarding this and schedules follow-up including Nico and Jukka Mar 21, 2023

    10

    ย 

    ย 

    11

    Approach me (Nico) on some issues during sprints. Still, I feel protected from some issues? (maybe because of workload?)

    regular session like weekly standup could be established @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Mar 20, 2023

    where possible, move questions, chats and issues to GovStack #sandbox channel except for internal and organisational topics

    12

    Deploy BB in Sandbox can be huge task, bb may have a lot of component or may be tricky to create running setup in our sandbox that takes a lot of time.

    covered by โ†’ BB vendors would keep in mind requirement about running app in cloud @Oleksii Danyliuk

    13

    (G)estimation for our activities to be afterword evaluate the learning and improve from that

    stays a desire for now โ†’ should be reviewed when feasible to introduce

    14

    Get an impression of the vibe in the team. E.g. exciting work or business as usual?

    see #11

    next retrospective https://www.funretrospectives.com/happiness-radar/ @Jonas Bergmeier

    15

    More UI stuff to do for me - not just wireframes

    asap!

    16

    that shared work results โ€œsink inโ€ after 1-2 exposures

    • relates to lack of constructive feedback

    see #6

    see #4

    ย