The IDBB document currently lacks the level of specificity required to ensure uniform interpretation and efficient implementation of the "identity" building block across all stakeholders.

Description

In essence, the identity building block (IDBB) document serves as the architectural blueprint for the "identity" component within the GOVSTACK framework. Its goal is to guide the implementation of this vital component across a multitude of diverse organizations. When there's a lack of explicitness and detail within this document, it can create room for interpretation that may diverge from the originally intended guidelines.

For instance, two different organizations may interpret a vaguely defined process or functionality in two distinct ways, resulting in disparate implementations. This discrepancy can lead to issues of interoperability, where the identity components implemented by different organizations do not function seamlessly together. In the worst-case scenario, this could disrupt the unified functioning of the GOVSTACK framework.

Furthermore, the lack of detail can hamper the efficiency of implementation. Implementing teams would have to spend extra time interpreting vague guidelines or reach out for clarifications, thus slowing down the implementation process.

So, the statement underscores the importance of having a well-detailed IDBB document. A comprehensive, explicit, and unambiguous document helps ensure that every organization involved interprets the guidelines in the same way, leading to uniform and efficient implementation. This clarity is crucial to ensure the smooth rollout and integration of the "identity" building block across all participating organizations, contributing to the overall success of the GOVSTACK initiative.

Jaume feedback: We will be happy to clarify anything that is to ambiguous, we would need you to point it out.

Activity

Show:

Ott SarvJune 8, 2023 at 8:56 AM

As appreciated as your offer for clarification is, Jaume, it's essential to recognize that the onus of providing a clear and comprehensible document rests with the creators. It is not efficient to expect every reader to request clarifications for sections they find ambiguous.

A more proactive approach would be to invest time in improving the details and specifics in the IDBB document proactively. This could involve enlisting an independent party to review the document for ambiguity or discrepancies, or even soliciting specific feedback from current and potential users about sections they found unclear.

The aim of our work is to make GovStack as user-friendly and accessible as possible. Ambiguities could potentially lead to inconsistencies in interpretation, causing variations in implementation that could be detrimental to the overall goal of our initiative. As such, we need to strive for a document that is as self-explanatory and comprehensible as possible, minimizing the need for additional clarifications.

Pinned fields
Click on the next to a field label to start pinning.

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Checklist

Created June 8, 2023 at 8:55 AM
Updated June 8, 2023 at 8:56 AM