...
Agenda | Presenter | Duration | Discussion | ||||||||||||||||
Update on Review Process | 15 minutes | Review tasks are assigned here:
All comments to be logged here: Architecture Team Review Steve: Consent and Workflow reviews here: Consent Feedback Consent Feedback Can Steve/Ramkumar merge any changes from these reviews into the specs, so we don’t have to wait on BB teams? Any technical questions/clarifications can go directly to the BB teams as we work through the reviews. Comments:
| |||||||||||||||||
Not discussed | |||||||||||||||||||
Adaptor Conversation | 40 minutes | Recap and comments on current approach for onboarding existing tools: https://govstack.gitbook.io/specification/architecture-and-nonfunctional-requirements/6-onboarding Discussion on adaptors and phased approach
| |||||||||||||||||
Next steps/AOB | 5 minutes | What should we prioritize? Can we spin off small groups to work through specific tasks? |
Action Items
- All to review comments (on Confluence and GitBook) and mark which things need to be done for the 1.0 publication (Now) versus in the future (Next)
- All to review the BB specification template and suggest changes (comments in GitBook is fine) so that we can make any required changes for Valeria (and others) to align the BB spec to