Attendees

Aare Laponin

Jukka Aaltonen (Deactivated)

PSRAMKUMAR

Wes Brown

Steve Conrad

Apologies

...

Uwe Wahser

Agenda	Presenter	Duration	Discussion
Review Process	Wes Brown Steve Conrad	30 minutes	Discuss Updates to BB template (in process): GitBook Section 4: Move the components (section 2) over to section 6. No need for 4.1 header - just provide a brief description and simplify the KDFs (still grouped by functional area). Less prose - just quickly show the key functionality that should be available. Some of the extra technical description currently in section 4 can be moved to section 6 as well. Try to structure as a simple list (4.1, 4.2, 4.3) where each item has a title and brief description Section 6: First section will define the components of the building block. Use diagram and brief description of each component Second section will reference each KDF from section 4 and outline functional requirements needed to implement (defined a bit more broadly than is currently shown). No need for technical details here. Should be able to define UATs from this section. Reference section 6 from scheduler for content - keep format the same Section 7: Remove standards from the table - reference any standards at the beginning of the section Find standard method for rendering the resource model (.drawio format) Steve, Wes, Valeria will work to migrate existing specs to the template format. Review tasks are assigned here: Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f5c6bdaf-d23e-347d-a1e8-579e20a81dda key TECH-394 Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f5c6bdaf-d23e-347d-a1e8-579e20a81dda key TECH-393 All comments to be logged here: Architecture Team Review Consent and Workflow reviews here: Consent Feedback Consent Feedback Discuss Updates to BB template (in process): GitBook Can Steve/Ramkumar merge any changes from these reviews into the specs, so we don’t have to wait on BB teams? Any technical questions/clarifications can go directly to the BB teams as we work through the reviews.
GERA Document Review	Steve Conrad	10 minutes	Purpose of the Document View file name GovStack_Ecosystem_Reference_Architecture.pdf Can architecture team review this document as well?
Adaptor Conversation	PSRAMKUMAR	30 minutes	Proposal from Nico to work with Sandbox team on Adaptors Recap and comments on current approach for onboarding existing tools: https://govstack.gitbook.io/specification/architecture-and-nonfunctional-requirements/6-onboarding Discussion on adaptors and phased approach Is the current approach correct? What is missing? Clear definitions of the various components, such as Information mediator When we talk about Information Mediator, what do we mean? Are there separate components that should be described, such as service discovery, API Gateway, payload transformation? When is a Workflow orchestration needed and when can BBs simply call other BBs (either with or without IM)? Clearly defining interactions between UX/UI and services provided by BBs Do we need to address Authentication/SSO/tokens If a DPG encapsulates multiple BB functionality, how do we handle that? Are the phases that are currently defined correct? Updating the current documentation and publishing new guidance for DPGs and implementers After we develop guidance, work with testing and sandbox team to validate. Identify first products to work with and build adaptors for
Next steps/AOB		5 minutes	What should we prioritize? Can we spin off small groups to work through specific tasks?

...