Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda

Presenter

Discussion

Action points from last week (fixed)

Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Jira Kanban update (fixed)

Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Testing plan

Benjamin Balder Bach

We have a testing plan in draft, it will be informative to SolDevelo. It’s not based on other BB’s test plans (we haven’t seen any, but Benjamin Balder Bach will ask ind hindsight).

https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent/pull/47

Update on testing development

Benjamin Balder Bach

Update:

  • New additions to testing and mock application

  • Improved structure

  • Discovered and fixed a systematic error in OpenYAML specs.

TODO:

  • Move focus 100% to WRITING Gherkin scenarios

  • SolDevelo ONLY implements scenarios that we write.

  • We start with configuration

  • Timeline is to handover Gherkin scenarios ready for implementation mid-week.

  • Gherkin scenarios will be written in this order:

    • configuration APIs

    • service APIs

    • auditing APIs

  • …this means there’s a natural progression of complexity.

  • Philippe Page will start with auditing in parallel.

Future collaboration with a tender

Skipped

Note-keeper: Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) you fell out of the meeting, but I talked to Ramkumar about the task that we have ahead of us: Understanding how we want to govern specification work as a WG once that a tender starts to actively work on a candidate application. I’ll put it here for the next meeting, and it sounds like PSRAMKUMAR already knows how WGs should function in this setting.

Updates from TC meeting (fixed)

Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Authentication and Cross-BB Authorization
We should give feedback to this document.

Gherkin scenario writing discussion (ongoing)

Skipped

Gherkin Scenario drafting document

Review necessary Gherkin scenarios to implement

Benjamin Balder Bach Skipped

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverIdf5c6bdaf-d23e-347d-a1e8-579e20a81dda
keyCON-15

Spec 2.0: Unfolding new roadmap items

Skipped

New issues

sasi

parked for future meeting

  • What do we expect other BBs that call Consent-BB to store?

  • When do we like to use Consent-BB and when do we not expect this? (This should also be know to the auditor.)

Discussion: How shall we address such matters, which do not fit into specification format?

...

Decision