Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Discussion

Evaluation report flow review

https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/whiteboard/300449806

Designs review

https://www.figma.com/file/9XudBIl7YAt3aH1nMBoO4L/govstack?type=design&node-id=1629-5341&mode=design&t=Vjk2nPjbWXddeRoI-0

  • We’re missing authentication designs.

    • Add login page for reviewers.

    • For now we will add accounts from the backend.

  • We’re missing review designs.

    • How do we want it to work? Should each requirement be reviewed one by one?

  • Evaluation report

    • How it It should look like , who the evaluation summary with notes for reviewer

    • they should be able to see all the reports and where should we add it?either Reject or Approve

Clarify requirements

  • How do we want to add this functionality to the current testing web app https://testing.govstack.global/ ? And should we do it?

  • What about authentication?

    • Authentication for GovStack team

      • One role for “approver” that can be assigned

    • Providers: Send email with custom link that can create/edit the compliance form + later link to custom review table

      • Email would be required

  • Statuses - do we need more statuses for reviewers? What statuses exactly do we need?

    • Draft

    • In review

    • Published

    • Rejected / Not passed

    • ?

  • Date - how should we indicate different evaluation dates in the software?

  • Compliance Level - should we add tooltips to explain what each compliance level means?

  • Saving draft (can be accessed again to finish submitting) - what flow of saving?

Identify any potential gaps

  • What happens if a person submits a form knowing that it does not fulfill a compliance level. Do we still show it? What do we call that state? "Not passed"?

  • What happens if a person submits an empty form? I suggest status "n/a"

  • Do we allow comments for each requirement? My impression so far was that people needed to explain why, why not or why partially something it met

Next steps

...