Q: Are there any priorities for the time after this publication?
Margus: Proposes a revision of the specifications, as some of the specs are use cases. i.e. identity BB. It includes more information that just specs. Goal could be turn some BB into smaller BBs.
Wes: Agrees that a review is a good idea. Some BBs need to be decomposed.
Meelis: Would like to see a review of the infrastructure. Create a check-list for onboarding purposes. Include further considerations about capabilities / service blocks.
Margus: Analyze: How can specs be used for procurement?How can governments take the specs and use them for ToRs?
Meelis: We can also discuss the vision that GovStack has with regards to the procurement and application of GS approach.
Margus: If we put ourselves in the shoes of a government official or talk to government official, we’ll be able to provide services that fit their needs.
Psramkumar: Sometimes it is not clear what exactly GovStack can provide, so we need better expectation management. Also, we can provide examples and pathways that illustrate application options.
Margus: technical requirements are not part of what GovStack can provide. But the functional layer can be provided by us.
Psramkumar: Guidelines and instructions to set up your own version of the sandbox should be provided.