Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  1. Define scope and goals of upcoming sessions

  2. Review index of information

  3. Test run over at least one wireframe to review BB involvement

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Notes

Comments

10min

Define scope and goals of upcoming sessions

  • clarify terminology and “product tracks”

  • take a look on our roadmap for bigger picture

  • goals of upcoming sessions

    • generally to reduce the amount of insecure assumptions

    • build shared understanding of which sources are relevant from technical perspective for our work ahead

    • map superficial BB involvement to wireframes and actions

    • identify risks

10min

Review index of information


Index of technical information sources

20min

Test run

https://www.figma.com/file/tq8VOr1v9LabYEbAZxVbvs/GovStack-Sandbox?node-id=1752%3A102138

wasn’t done in first session

✅ Action items

⤴ Decisions

  • Follow-Up arranged for , primary goal: Identify explicit UI and action-based BB involvement in USCT Simulation

Follow-Up on

Martha Vasquez Steve Conrad Artun Gürkan Jonas Bergmeier

Goals

  • Test run over at least one wireframe to review BB involvement: Identify explicit UI and action-based BB involvement in USCT Simulation

  • Check in regarding capabilities: If, when and could we contribute and feedback?

Notes and Action Items

Steves Feedback on Wireframes

  • Payment - adding Voucher payment options, currently only bank options visible

  • Wireframes Feedback - Create more versions of different states (e.g. Civil Servant view, more possible outcomes, validation pages)

  • Data storage - where is it stored right now? Additional data, registration, digital registry not sufficient enough

  • Localisation - multi language options should be considered

Goals - Test run Notes

  • ID Buildingblock - Authentication; Information Mediators, workflow building block

    • Would we store a list of civil servants and their roles on a digital registry?
      Where would we store the list?
      Not defined by the current building blocks

    • Rolebased management is part of the security but not defined yet.

    • Registry topic - clarification necessary for the MVP

    • Is there a separate database that will store information about civil servants (including their roles/permissions)

    • What BBs manage the login process? The ID BB is just for foundational ID, so how is login managed?

  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yyuzxfAQndrxkNaya5kcSbhc9hFqQ2vZtUF4aDPdvaI/edit related BB

  • identify the high level BBs for the next steps

  • Digital registry database stores who is registered and enrolled

  • Workflow BB - which information (Programs) does the civil servant has access to?

  • https://app.gitbook.com/o/pxmRWOPoaU8fUAbbcrus/s/PzBEEsm2haAbBj2uBAKN/consent

Action Item

  • No labels