...
Meeting link: https://meet.google.com/rsf-cqaq-eyq at 07:30 UTC / 09:30 CET / 13:00 IST
Attendees
Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) (meeting facilitator; meeting note keeper as Benjamin was in the train today)
Benjamin Balder Bach (weekly note keeper and time keeper)
Meeting Note
Agenda | Presenter | Discussion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Action points from last week (fixed) | ||||||||||
Jira Kanban update (fixed) | ||||||||||
Testing plan | We have a testing plan in draft, it will be informative to SolDevelo. It’s not based on other BB’s test plans (we haven’t seen any, but Benjamin Balder Bach will ask ind hindsight). | |||||||||
Update on testing development | Update:
TODO:
| |||||||||
Future collaboration with a tender | Skipped | Note-keeper: Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) you fell out of the meeting, but I talked to Ramkumar about the task that we have ahead of us: Understanding how we want to govern specification work as a WG once that a tender starts to actively work on a candidate application. I’ll put it here for the next meeting, and it sounds like PSRAMKUMAR already knows how WGs should function in this setting. | ||||||||
Updates from TC meeting (fixed) | Authentication and Cross-BB Authorization | |||||||||
Gherkin scenario writing discussion (ongoing) | Skipped | |||||||||
Review necessary Gherkin scenarios to implement | Benjamin Balder Bach Skipped |
| ||||||||
Spec 2.0: Unfolding new roadmap items | Skipped | |||||||||
New issues | parked for future meeting |
Discussion: How shall we address such matters, which do not fit into specification format? | ||||||||
New Action Items
Action Items from previous meetings
- Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) add and maintain definitions for subjects of Gherkin scenarios
- Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) consider if the decision to have “external ID” and “external ID type” referencing Individuals is relevant for the Key Desicion Log (if it’s not already there)
- Philippe Page will finish the initial descriptions and commit himself to the ones he feels appropriate
- sasi will articulate in Consent BB FAQ these questions to be addressed
(the group can then address them and decide where and how their later proper “place” will be) - to write the outcome of discussions with Philippe Page 2w ago Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Review Consent BB FAQ and indicate if an answer is accepted Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) Philippe Page
- Have someone send out https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/224821268/Call+Experts+for+GovStack+s+Consent+Working+Group Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Review this: https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent/pull/38 Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Deceptive pattern review Benjamin Balder Bach Laurence Berry (we exchanged a few links and ideas during the final UX spec writing)
- Formulate questions to Payment BB about account mapper Benjamin Balder Bach
- Give feedback to Authentication and Cross-BB Authorization Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Present mock application to sandbox team Liaise with sandbox team Benjamin Balder Bach
- Put Consent BB on the agenda for today’s testing meeting Benjamin Balder Bach
Decision
- We adopt the test plan in order to present it later: https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent/pull/47#pullrequestreview-1482962434