About this document: Agenda and notes are kept in the same document, a separate copy of the document is maintained for each meeting. Please add agenda points before the meeting. Action items created in previous meeting and all other unresolved action items are kept in the document. Please tick off any completed items.
Meeting link: https://meet.google.com/rsf-cqaq-eyq at 07:30 UTC / 09:30 CET / 13:00 IST
Attendees
Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) (meeting facilitator; meeting note keeper as Benjamin was in the train today)
Benjamin Balder Bach (weekly note keeper and time keeper)
Meeting Note
Agenda | Presenter | Discussion |
|---|---|---|
Action points from last week (fixed) | ||
Jira Kanban update (fixed) | ||
Testing plan | We have a testing plan in draft, it will be informative to SolDevelo. It’s not based on other BB’s test plans (we haven’t seen any, but Benjamin Balder Bach will ask ind hindsight). | |
Update on testing development | Update:
TODO:
| |
Future collaboration with a tender | Skipped | Note-keeper: Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) you fell out of the meeting, but I talked to Ramkumar about the task that we have ahead of us: Understanding how we want to govern specification work as a WG once that a tender starts to actively work on a candidate application. I’ll put it here for the next meeting, and it sounds like PSRAMKUMAR already knows how WGs should function in this setting. |
Updates from TC meeting (fixed) | Authentication and Cross-BB Authorization | |
Gherkin scenario writing discussion (ongoing) | Skipped | |
Review necessary Gherkin scenarios to implement | Benjamin Balder Bach Skipped | CON-15 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
Spec 2.0: Unfolding new roadmap items | Skipped | |
New issues | parked for future meeting |
Discussion: How shall we address such matters, which do not fit into specification format? |
New Action Items
Action Items from previous meetings
- Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) add and maintain definitions for subjects of Gherkin scenarios
- Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) consider if the decision to have “external ID” and “external ID type” referencing Individuals is relevant for the Key Desicion Log (if it’s not already there)
- Philippe Page will finish the initial descriptions and commit himself to the ones he feels appropriate
- sasi will articulate in Consent BB FAQ these questions to be addressed
(the group can then address them and decide where and how their later proper “place” will be) - to write the outcome of discussions with Philippe Page 2w ago Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Review Consent BB FAQ and indicate if an answer is accepted Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) Philippe Page
- Have someone send out https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/224821268/Call+Experts+for+GovStack+s+Consent+Working+Group Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Review this: https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent/pull/38 Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Deceptive pattern review Benjamin Balder Bach Laurence Berry (we exchanged a few links and ideas during the final UX spec writing)
- Formulate questions to Payment BB about account mapper Benjamin Balder Bach
- Give feedback to Authentication and Cross-BB Authorization Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
- Present mock application to sandbox team Liaise with sandbox team Benjamin Balder Bach
- Put Consent BB on the agenda for today’s testing meeting Benjamin Balder Bach
Decision
- We adopt the test plan in order to present it later: https://github.com/GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent/pull/47#pullrequestreview-1482962434