UV\uD83D\uDDD3 Date
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
Nico Lueck
Satyajit Suri
Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated)
Jonas Bergmeier
Artun Gürkan
Priit Puru
Meelis Zujev (Deactivated)
jarkkohyoty
Kimmo Hedemäki (Deactivated)
Akseli Karvinen
Owusu, Farina Carolina GIZ
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
Overview of last week’s progress and raised questions
...
Item | Presenter | Notes | Approx. duration | Meeting Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Demo for USCT UX sprint | USCT UI/UX sprint achievements. General Layout designs and USCT UIs | 10 min | Artun did quick owerview of UX team progress and ongoing activity- all tasks are listed in Sprint 3 and continous work in Sprint 4. | |
Portal backend | Sandbox portal , backend project and https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/GovStackWorkingGroup/sandbox-portal-backend | 10min |
| |
Open Review call | Similar to the first, have a second meeting showcasing to everyone interested the work delivered (e.g. ) Which things to show? | 5 min | agreed to look into it after this sprint. | |
|
| 5min | ||
Sandbox risk management | How we should tackel the risk management topic in Sandbox project? | Will be discussed in Tuesday meeting | ||
Mission of Sandbox team | To revise after 2 months: Has every team member bought into the mission statement or to we need to change something? Functional Scope of the Sandbox - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) |
| ||
GovCase | I have the impression, that some guiding external conditions, beside use cases and user needs might be helpful. For architectural decisions and sandbox explanations. Do you agree? More ideas for the factsheet? GovCase - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) | |||
First release? | After which sprint do we aim to release product increments? | Will be discussed during next sprints |
✅ Action items from last weekly
...
- Taylor manages the Govstack account for CircleCI- now clarity about free licence capabilities.
There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities. > deal with the problem when it occurs > may need additional work. - General resolution for such kind of concerns > give for response due date and after that continue according to best practice you planned.
- Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Roadmap dis
- Retrospective meeting planned
- 3 Sprint lasts for 3 weeks (02.01.2023)
- Cloud setup 1st feedback meeting
- Empathy Map → Individual review and feedback
Priit Puru jarkkohyoty Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Akseli Karvinen Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Artun Gürkan Jonas Bergmeier (Nico Lueck Satyajit Suri Wes Brown )
Example questions for personal review:
How can I counteract pains?
How can I fulfill their desires?
What are other conclusions for the sandbox area I am working on?
In particular, how can I incorporate and, at best, answer the political and economic questions, problems, and goals within the Sandbox (and for Nico/Govstack additionally before, beside and after the Sandbox)?
✅ Action items
- 03.01 Retrospective meeting https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ODhmMjk4NDItNjY2OS00MjQ0LTlhODktMTAwZmVhMjNlNDVl%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%224b4e036d-f94b-4209-8f07-6860b3641366%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22aadd7fd8-074a-4ae2-a4df-61b3f71401ad%22%7d(adjusted agenda Empathy Map → Individual review and feedback; Mission of Sandbox, Risk management principles in sandbox project)
⤴ Decisions
- Periodically face and review the adequacy of our work against the project goal and mission.
- All team members look through the findings from Empathy map outcomes and analyze from a personal level the takeaways for daily work in the project.