2023-01-02 Meeting notes - Weekly review
- Nico Lueck
- Meelis Zujev (Deactivated)
- Jonas Bergmeier
UV Date
Jan 2, 2023
Participants
@Nico Lueck
@Satyajit Suri
@Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated)
@Jonas Bergmeier
@Artun Gürkan
@Priit Puru
@Meelis Zujev (Deactivated)
@jarkkohyoty
@Kimmo Hedemäki (Deactivated)
@Akseli Karvinen
Owusu, Farina Carolina GIZ
Goals
Overview of last week’s progress and raised questions
Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Notes | Approx. duration | Meeting Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Demo for USCT UX sprint | @Artun Gürkan | USCT UI/UX sprint achievements. General Layout designs and USCT UIs | 10 min | Artun did quick owerview of UX team progress and ongoing activity- all tasks are listed in Sprint 3 and continous work in Sprint 4. |
Portal backend | @jarkkohyoty and @Kimmo Hedemäki (Deactivated) | Sandbox portal , backend project and https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/GovStackWorkingGroup/sandbox-portal-backend | 10min |
|
Open Review call | @Nico Lueck | Similar to the first, have a second meeting showcasing to everyone interested the work delivered (e.g. Jan 25, 2023 ) Which things to show? | 5 min | agreed to look into it after this sprint. |
Pay BB Onboarding | @Nico Lueck | What do we show to Mifos? Each provider individually or all together? | 5min |
|
Sandbox risk management | @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) | How we should tackel the risk management topic in Sandbox project? |
| Will be discussed in Tuesday meeting |
Mission of Sandbox team | @Nico Lueck | To revise after 2 months: Has every team member bought into the mission statement or to we need to change something? Functional Scope of the Sandbox - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) |
|
It will be discussed on next meeting. (+Emphaty Map) |
GovCase | @Nico Lueck | I have the impression, that some guiding external conditions, beside use cases and user needs might be helpful. For architectural decisions and sandbox explanations. Do you agree? More ideas for the factsheet? GovCase - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) |
|
|
First release? | @Nico Lueck | After which sprint do we aim to release product increments? |
| Will be discussed during next sprints |
Action items from last weekly
There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities. > deal with the problem when it occurs > may need additional work.
@Priit Puru @jarkkohyoty @Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) @Akseli Karvinen @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) @Artun Gürkan @Jonas Bergmeier (@Nico Lueck @Satyajit Suri @Wes Brown )
Example questions for personal review:
How can I counteract pains?
How can I fulfill their desires?
What are other conclusions for the sandbox area I am working on?
In particular, how can I incorporate and, at best, answer the political and economic questions, problems, and goals within the Sandbox (and for Nico/Govstack additionally before, beside and after the Sandbox)?
Action items
Decisions
- Periodically face and review the adequacy of our work against the project goal and mission.
- All team members look through the findings from Empathy map outcomes and analyze from a personal level the takeaways for daily work in the project.