Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

UV\uD83D\uDDD3 Date


The meeting was held in the Govstack Slack channel

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Overview of last week’s progress and raised questions

...

Item

Presenter

Notes

week 50 Weekly overviw

Sprint 2 accomplishments and bitfalls
1. Customer / client centric approach

Onboarding UI quick walk through from tech point of view. (feedback appreciated)

2. Technical view-
Cloud rediness
DevSecOp- page created with initial content

Concerns:
API specification regarding UI content

Sprint 3 goals

week 49 progress
Sprint 2

team
UI /UX (Jonas and Priit)
Deployment process draft (Kimmo) GovStack sandbox execution environment
Cloud enviroment set-up (Akseli)
API- compliancy validation and (Bert) CI/CD tool evaluation

Architecture refinement (Jarkko)https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DEMO/pages/102105089/A+GovStack+Instance

Interaction between other WG-s (Meelis)

  • UX/UI team will share USCT analysis results next week meeting

  • Emphaty map results will not be finished during this sprint due to the workshop time.

  • Priit Puru demonstrated a quick overview of the component library/foundation for Sandbox.

  • Chakra was selected for Frontend Framework due to various reasons (such as accessibility)

  • BBs should not have to customized by Gofore team. But BBs have certain limitation that makes it hard to automated. Hence certain customization/configuration might require manual steps.

  • Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Presented the CI/CD tool evaluation. Currently, based on the findings CircleCI will be picked.

  • At the moment, all the building blocks will run through the same security server based on the architecture refinement. It will have some example to show what is the realistic approach and how users can implement. Nico Lueck Proposed to take more realistic approach. Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) proposed to create most feasible and cost effective setup of sandbox to be designed, in addition Gofore team highlight the topics what users can make different for scenarios/setups etc.There is still a lot of confusion at API specification level regarding UI components presence at API specification. Potential candidates for integrationa all have quite heavy UI part witch brings a lot of complexity into the setup. This topic needs to be resoleved at Technical Committee level by setting up API specification regualtion. It is relevant also for potential candidates for validating they comlience with Govstack.

  • Sprint 3 goals
    Finish generic User research
    Front-end: sign on for public demo /
    IM deployed in a Cloud environment-
    Sandbox back-end (portal) implementation planned
    Candidate BB involeved into Sandbox (APP in container)
    CircleCI was taken into us

  • Retrospective will be done at next week during Weekley in figma https://www.figma.com/file/whRP4NXDTy13kXYU6TRAih/Visioning-Roadmap?node-id=0%3A1&t=dc7J7YLCTemNhTqq-3

  • For quiker feedback for sandbox tech solution Nico Lueck will propose 10 minute slot at tech Committee meeting next week

Sandbox visioning

https://www.figma.com/file/whRP4NXDTy13kXYU6TRAih/Visioning-Roadmap?node-id=0%3A1&t=lzW2R68ekwEDs1dd-1

  • roadmap is open for commenting- review will be done after Nico returns.

✅ Action items

  •  Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Roadmap discussion on a higher level will be continued after Nico returns to work
  •  Taylor manages the Govstack account for CircleCI- now clarity about free licence capabilities.
    There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities.
  •   Jonas Bergmeier Artun Gürkan will share UCSCT analysis during the next meeting
  •  Empathy mapping will be presented at next weekly meeting

⤴ Decisions