/
2022-12-12 Meeting notes- Weekly review

2022-12-12 Meeting notes- Weekly review

UV Date

Dec 12, 2022
The meeting was held in the Govstack Slack channel

 Participants

  • @Meelis Zujev (Deactivated)

  • @Nico Lueck (not attending- sikk_leave)

  • @Akseli Karvinen

  • @Wes Brown

  • @jarkkohyoty

  • @Priit Puru

  • @Bert Viikmäe (not attending- planned vocation)

  • @Jonas Bergmeier

  • @Artun Gürkan (Deactivated)

  • @Satyajit Suri (not attending_ travelling)

 Goals

Overview of last week’s progress and raised questions

  •  Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Notes

Item

Presenter

Notes

week 50 Weekly overviw

Sprint 2 accomplishments and bitfalls
1. Customer / client centric approach

Onboarding UI quick walk through from tech point of view. (feedback appreciated)

2. Technical view-
Cloud rediness
DevSecOp- page created with initial content

Concerns:
API specification regarding UI content

Sprint 3 goals

  • UX/UI : The first onboarding drafts has been created and reflected upon the team. Onboarding frontend section, creation of empathy map and emphaty workshops are the next plans. USCT last analyses was sharedhttps://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DEMO/pages/115965959/Use+Case+USCT+Unconditional+Social+Cash+Transfer+User+Flow+Draft.

  • https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/116490307 draft ideas presented. Authentication delegated to OpenID. AWS Cognito can be used for authentication (investigating).

  • https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/102563876 presented. Implementation follows the AWS implementation guidlieness. Between BBs communication will be conducted through information mediator but direct communication also can be option if it is needed. BB developers would not be allowed to have direct access only Sandbox Admins would be allowed.

  • https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/114098177 shared.

  • There is still a lot of confusion at API specification level regarding UI components presence at API specification. Potential candidates for integrationa all have quite heavy UI part witch brings a lot of complexity into the setup. This topic needs to be resoleved at Technical Committee level by setting up API specification regualtion. It is relevant also for potential candidates for validating they comlience with Govstack.

  • Sprint 3 goals
    Finish generic User research
    Front-end: sign on for public demo /
    IM deployed in a Cloud environment-
    Sandbox back-end (portal) implementation planned
    Candidate BB involeved into Sandbox (APP in container)
    CircleCI was taken into us

  • Retrospective will be done at next week during Weekley in figma (Archived) Visioning Roadmap

  • For quiker feedback for sandbox tech solution @Nico Lueck will propose 10 minute slot at tech Committee meeting next week

Sandbox visioning

(Archived) Visioning Roadmap

  • roadmap is open for commenting- review will be done after Nico returns.

 Action items

@Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Roadmap discussion on a higher level will be continued after Nico returns to work
Taylor manages the Govstack account for CircleCI- now clarity about free licence capabilities.
There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities.
@Jonas Bergmeier @Artun Gürkan (Deactivated) will share UCSCT analysis during the next meeting
Empathy mapping will be presented at next weekly meeting

 

 Decisions