UV\uD83D\uDDD3 Date
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
Overview of last week’s progress and raised questions
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Notes | Approx. duration | Meeting Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Demo for USCT UX sprint | USCT UI/UX sprint achievements. General Layout designs and USCT UIs | 10 min | ||
Portal backend | Sandbox portal , backend project and https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/GovStackWorkingGroup/sandbox-portal-backend | 10min |
| |
Open Review call | Similar to the first, have a second meeting showcasing to everyone interested the work delivered (e.g. ) Which things to show? | 5 min | ||
|
| 5min | ||
Sandbox risk management | How we should tackel the risk management topic in Sandbox project? | |||
Mission of Sandbox team | To revise after 2 months: Has every team member bought into the mission statement or to we need to change something? Functional Scope of the Sandbox - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) |
| ||
GovCase | I have the impression, that some guiding external conditions, beside use cases and user needs might be helpful. For architectural decisions and sandbox explanations. Do you agree? More ideas for the factsheet? GovCase - Demo/Sandbox - GovStack Wiki (atlassian.net) | |||
First release? | After which sprint do we aim to release product increments? |
✅ Action items from last weekly
- Taylor manages the Govstack account for CircleCI- now clarity about free licence capabilities.
There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities. > deal with the problem when it occurs > may need additional work. - General resolution for such kind of concerns > give for response due date and after that continue according to best practice you planned.
- Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Roadmap dis
- Retrospective meeting planned
- 3 Sprint lasts for 3 weeks (02.01.2023)
- Cloud setup 1st feedback meeting
- Empathy Map → Individual review and feedback
Priit Puru jarkkohyoty Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Akseli Karvinen Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Artun Gürkan Jonas Bergmeier (Nico Lueck Satyajit Suri Wes Brown )
Example questions for personal review:
How can I counteract pains?
How can I fulfill their desires?
What are other conclusions for the sandbox area I am working on?
In particular, how can I incorporate and, at best, answer the political and economic questions, problems, and goals within the Sandbox (and for Nico/Govstack additionally before, beside and after the Sandbox)?
✅ Action items
- 03.01 Retrospective meeting https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ODhmMjk4NDItNjY2OS00MjQ0LTlhODktMTAwZmVhMjNlNDVl%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%224b4e036d-f94b-4209-8f07-6860b3641366%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22aadd7fd8-074a-4ae2-a4df-61b3f71401ad%22%7d(adjusted agenda Empathy Map → Individual review and feedback; Mission of Sandbox, Risk management principles in sandbox project)
Add Comment