Sandbox portal draft ideas presented. Authentication delegated to OpenID. AWS Cognito can be used for authentication (investigating).
GovStack sandbox execution environment presented. Implementation follows the AWS implementation guidlieness. Between BBs communication will be conducted through information mediator but direct communication also can be option if it is needed. BB developers would not be allowed to have direct access only Sandbox Admins would be allowed.
UX/UI team will share USCT analysis results next week meeting
Emphaty map results will not be finished during this sprint due to the workshop time.
Priit Puru demonstrated a quick overview of the component library/foundation for Sandbox.
Chakra was selected for Frontend Framework due to various reasons (such as accessibility)
BBs should not have to customized by Gofore team. But BBs have certain limitation that makes it hard to automated. Hence certain customization/configuration might require manual steps.
Bert Viikmäe (Deactivated) Presented the CI/CD tool evaluation. Currently, based on the findings CircleCI will be picked.
At the moment, all the building blocks will run through the same security server based on the architecture refinement. It will have some example to show what is the realistic approach and how users can implement. Nico Lueck Proposed to take more realistic approach. Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) proposed to create most feasible and cost effective setup of sandbox to be designed, in addition Gofore team highlight the topics what users can make different for scenarios/setups etc.
roadmap is open for commenting- review will be done after Nico returns.
✅ Action items
Meelis Zujev (Deactivated) Roadmap discussion on a higher level will be continued after Nico returns to work
Taylor manages the Govstack account for CircleCI- now clarity about free licence capabilities. There is a strong risk, that Sandbox will overrun free licence capabilities.
Add Comment