IDBB demo, where to host ?

 Jaume

 Option 1] MOSIP could propose to host the instance, Ramesh to check and come back next week on what’s possible. [w31/Ramesh: possible to deliver a MOSIP instance within August (2-3 weeks from now) and with Alpha version for OIDC and Biometrics early September (+4 weeks) + 4 weeks for a final version] [Priorities: Authentication, Attributes sharing]

Option 2] Extend the existing demo environment to host required MOSIP platform, need to define requirements, could be done by the bidders on IDBB. As this is resource to be addressed in the resources review meeting (this Thursday ? TBC)

 OIDC detailed objectives, OIDC falk on-boarding

Jaume 

 Clarification and alignment where made today

• We should have contributor people and reviewers

  • ie MOSIP is going to come with draft proposals on OIDV, VC, .. we should have reviewing meeting/audience

  • We would like to have OIDC people on-boarded as contributors and for sure in review

• For joining WG OIDC people should follow the ‘Call for expert process’ then they will be on-boarded officialy

• Coming new features in OIDC, openID VC supporting VC (replacing somewhere OIDC profiles), leverage similar protocols

• MOSIP is exploring with OIDC folks the use of biometrics with OIDC, a draft proposal will be presented before mid-August (ideally in a couple of weeks)

• VC will move us to the concept of Claims that could be generalized to Functional IDs

• Mission of IDBB is notably to be capable to make sure data belongs to a person even if those data are external from the Foundational ID (this relay to concept of Alias and ID Mapping mechanism)

• In the end an individual could expose a set of VC which could access to could be granted to relying parties including with preliminary individual consent

[W31]

• Need to shortly introduce GovStack/IDBB in today’s meeting with OIf

  • GovStack intro/goals, IDBB overview (use this summary slide), explain key services

• Need to be clear on what we expect

  • We need visibility on OIDC VC roadmap

  • We need clarity on Interoperability of profile using VC

  • We would need some identified names with roles. They could come as reviewer, could contribute to specific meeting