April 18, 2024, Technical Committee Meeting

Date

Apr 18, 2024

Participants

@Shukla, Ayush
@PSRAMKUMAR
@Rounak Nayak
@Steve Conrad
@Esther Ogunjimi
@Martha Mundas
@Aleksander Reitsakas
@Nico Lueck
@Martin Karner
@Wes Brown
@Farai Mutero

Agenda

Feedback of Tech Community MeetUp - 10 mins - @Shukla, Ayush
Topics of future scope of WGs - 10 mins - @PSRAMKUMAR
Wallet Building Block - Progress & Status - 20 mins - @Jaume DUBOIS / @Rounak Nayak
Status Update from WG Leads - 20 mins

Time	Item	Presenter	Notes

Time	Item	Presenter	Notes
20 mins	Wallet Building Block - Progress & Status	@Jaume DUBOIS
10 min	Feedback of Tech Community MeetUp	@Shukla, Ayush	@Shukla, Ayush sharing Feedback Doc @Martha Mundas We are working on actionable recommendations from the feedback provided. Feel free to provide any recommendations you may have
10 min	Topics of future scope of WGs	@PSRAMKUMAR	Ask present WGs to provide a list of topics for future scope of respective WG to @PSRAMKUMAR and @Martha Mundas in order to target potential new contributors/experts precisely @Martin Karner Requesting experts that have XP in terms of building asynchronous engine. @Nico Lueck we have partners that are deving voice chatbots on Open Language Models. @Nico Lueck Rapid pro was inserting solution in compliance tool, they made a mistake. We are trying to reach out to them to correct it. Haven't heard from them since. @Farai Mutero We require feedback from country implementation teams. This will allow us to ID parts of specs that need rework or update. @PSRAMKUMAR these are early stages of discovery. But in most discussions, we converged on workflow as a backend element, client side workflow can be covered. This will make the spec more comprehensive. In most of the cases we will be better off with a few examples that demo for workflow BB. @Aleksander Reitsakas from IM BB we will like XP in data spaces. Will share a few links with @Nico Lueck on this role. @Shukla, Ayush to collect the future scopes from Confluence for each BB for review by @PSRAMKUMAR and @Martha Mundas Here is an example of future scope from the Consent BB: Future Considerations (Consent) @Martha Mundas lets define the GovStack technical vision and have @Nico Lueck present it in the next TC. @Nico Lueck will provide a brief outlook @Steve Conrad best if we have the specs reviewed by external folk. Can we do an outreach to CDPI or DPGA etc. @Martin Karner has a person that has interest in reviewing specs, based on their interest shown previously. @Wes Brown on incentives that can be given to experts: A recognition of being competent in the field.
20 mins	Status Update from WG Leads		Wallet BB: 2 months into work, we realise there is a big need for wallets.

Meeting Recording

TBA

Action items

TBA