/
April 18, 2024, Technical Committee Meeting

April 18, 2024, Technical Committee Meeting

 Date

Apr 18, 2024

 Participants

  • @Shukla, Ayush

  • @PSRAMKUMAR

  • @Rounak Nayak

  • @Steve Conrad

  • @Esther Ogunjimi

  • @Martha Mundas

  • @Aleksander Reitsakas

  • @Nico Lueck

  • @Martin Karner

  • @Wes Brown

  • @Farai Mutero

 Agenda

  • Feedback of Tech Community MeetUp - 10 mins - @Shukla, Ayush

  • Topics of future scope of WGs - 10 mins - @PSRAMKUMAR

  • Wallet Building Block - Progress & Status - 20 mins - @Jaume DUBOIS / @Rounak Nayak

  • Status Update from WG Leads - 20 mins

 

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

20 mins

Wallet Building Block - Progress & Status

@Jaume DUBOIS

 

10 min

Feedback of Tech Community MeetUp

@Shukla, Ayush

  • @Shukla, Ayush sharing Feedback Doc

  • @Martha Mundas We are working on actionable recommendations from the feedback provided. Feel free to provide any recommendations you may have

10 min

Topics of future scope of WGs

@PSRAMKUMAR

  • Ask present WGs to provide a list of topics for future scope of respective WG to @PSRAMKUMAR and @Martha Mundas in order to target potential new contributors/experts precisely

  • @Martin Karner

    • Requesting experts that have XP in terms of building asynchronous engine.

    • @Nico Lueck we have partners that are deving voice chatbots on Open Language Models.

    • @Nico Lueck Rapid pro was inserting solution in compliance tool, they made a mistake. We are trying to reach out to them to correct it. Haven't heard from them since.

    • @Farai Mutero We require feedback from country implementation teams. This will allow us to ID parts of specs that need rework or update.

      • @PSRAMKUMAR these are early stages of discovery. But in most discussions,

        • we converged on workflow as a backend element, client side workflow can be covered. This will make the spec more comprehensive.

        • In most of the cases we will be better off with a few examples that demo for workflow BB.

    • @Aleksander Reitsakas from IM BB we will like XP in data spaces. Will share a few links with @Nico Lueck on this role.

    • @Shukla, Ayush to collect the future scopes from Confluence for each BB for review by @PSRAMKUMAR and @Martha Mundas

    • @Martha Mundas lets define the GovStack technical vision and have @Nico Lueck present it in the next TC. @Nico Lueck will provide a brief outlook

    • @Steve Conrad best if we have the specs reviewed by external folk. Can we do an outreach to CDPI or DPGA etc.

    • @Martin Karner has a person that has interest in reviewing specs, based on their interest shown previously.

    • @Wes Brown on incentives that can be given to experts: A recognition of being competent in the field.

20 mins

Status Update from WG Leads

 

Wallet BB:

  • 2 months into work, we realise there is a big need for wallets.

Meeting Recording

TBA

 Action items

TBA

Related content