Digital Registries Feedback
Feedback Template
Source ID/Section | Comment | Feedback Type | Jira Issue |
---|---|---|---|
|
| Now (blocker), Next (future publication), Feedback (question) | Create issue only once comment has been reviewed |
DRS-35 | Analyst must have capabilities to automate data exchange between databases internally and externally via API.
|
|
|
DRS-36 | Analyst may have capabilities to use database schema templates so that the registry creation is faster.
|
|
|
DRS-22 | Statistical queries: Produce standard statistical reports / Allow the analyst/user to analyze data collected in the system
|
|
|
DRS-23 | BB must enable client systems to process (CRUD) the database records via Open API services.
|
|
|
DRS-24 | BB must have an Open API service list (Swagger) to visualize all API services and API service versions.
|
|
|
DRS-26 | Statistical queries via API.
|
|
|
user story 4 | Registry Schema API
|
|
|
general | Are we talking about Registries or Data-Base Management Systems? Especially the paradigm of a fully programmable RDBMS without any business logic does not meet real world requirements and would systematically exclude most existing Digital Registry DPGs where the value lies in configurable best practice algorithms for specific registry types e.g. patient registers or social beneficiary registers. |
|
|
section 6.5 | [A. Laponin] Please, align it with requirements in the template: this section shall have list of requirements, i.e., what system has to do and what user has to be able to accomplish using the system. | Now | DR-88: Update the Functional Requirements to Align to the TemplateDone |
section 6.5 | [A. Laponin] The section 6.5 is something else and probably can be moved to the section. | Now | DR-87: Move 6.5 Coverage Map from the Functional Requirements SectionDone |