| Publication Process feedback – form | Margus | to share at the gov meeting today set scope of what we mean by process the audience of the form is established contributors use the working group member list, everyone who has an account on Jira should be covered, are we looking at both those who have been actively participating in creating specs AND those that are looking from the outside? ADD question - have you contributed content to the 1.0 release? use this to filter questions More between “contributors” and “observers” as a better way of saying internal/external 1 into two questions preceding question about attending training or watching videos
What are we going to do with the results? Especially if they are negative reword qualitative questions so that we ask “what can we do better next time?” rather than what went wrong “are you a working group member?” are the current questions repetitive? was the process well defined? Was the process well communicated? was the process followed? likert scale
|