September 8, 2023 Architecture Team Meeting Notes
Attendees
@Wes Brown
@PSRAMKUMAR
@Taylor Downs
@Trev Harmon
@Steve Conrad
@Paweł Gesek
Apologies
Agenda | Presenter | Duration | Discussion |
Technical Reviews of BB specs | @Steve Conrad | 10 minutes | Architecture team to review Wave 3 specifications: Target Friday August 11 to complete reviews Update on review process:
Wes to review Wave 3 BBs to ensure that they are aligned to the template. Ramkumar to work with Wave 3 teams to get complete list of contributors. @Steve Conrad - Set up meeting with eMarketplace so that we can articulate the current and future scope, as well as what procurement functionality should be included (either current or future) Specific question for Architecture team: MKT-154: Service APIs Section - Technical Review for Non-REST APIsDone Provide clear examples of complete solutions that address a use case that show how they are composed of various BBs. Next release can focus more on service blocks and how to use GovStack to create solutions. |
PAERA Update | @Aare Laponin @PSRAMKUMAR | 15 minutes | Update on changes to PAERA document and progress/next steps Working draft: Ready for review and comment (Sections 1-3). Steve and Wes to review. Need to decide where this lives for the upcoming release (GitBook, linked, PDF)?
|
Capabilities/Service Blocks | @Wes Brown | 15 minutes | Review service block (capabilities) template Need clear definition of distinction between building block and service block. |
Future Topic - September | @PSRAMKUMAR |
| Go through key learnings from Egypt deep dive and Kenya roadshow and map out how to address them in the architecture documents |
Future Topic - October | @Wes Brown |
| Identify experts that can do reviews of all Wave 1, 2, 3 BBs and map out process for external reviews |
Future Topic | @Steve Conrad |
| How to articulate the different levels/scopes of building blocks - foundational/DPI, functional, and possibly application (things like eMarketplace). This should be clearly articulated in GovStack documentation. Identify BBs that are missing/needed and develop plan to address those new BBs |
Future topic - Fall 2023 Manage Access Authorization to BB APIs | @Jaume DUBOIS | 30 minutes |
From Technical Committee Meeting: BBs should not own RBAC - the calling applications are responsible for it. Are we using token based authorization within the request to BB? How to get candidates bypass its own RBAC?
|
Action Items
Ramkumar to connect with Hani/Nico on infra requirements
Future Topics
Define a standard set of APIs that are needed for any BB to indicate that they are running, configured and ready to use in the sandbox (or test harness). Do we need a BB registry?