April 21, 2023 Architecture Team Meeting Notes

Attendees

@Paweł Gesek

@Taylor Downs

@Jukka Aaltonen (Deactivated)

@Uwe Wahser

@Oleksii Danyliuk

@Steve Conrad

Apologies

@Wes Brown

 

 

Agenda

Presenter

Duration

Discussion

Review Process

@Wes Brown

@Steve Conrad

 20 minutes

Arch team to go through each BB and do a manual review.

Known/outstanding issues:

  •  

 

Review tasks are assigned here:

https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/browse/TECH-394

https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/browse/TECH-393

All comments to be logged here: Architecture Team Review

 

Determine next steps and schedule for review work.

 

Adaptor Conversation

@Steve Conrad

@PSRAMKUMAR

30 minutes

Adaptor concept: Adaptor Concept

Core questions:

  • Is it valid for a BB to initiate a request to another BB? What about UX or BBs like Registration?

    • An application making a request of a GovStack BB needs to know how to format that request in the correct format

    • For a BB like registration, can we make a requirement that an outbound request has to have a specific format?

      • Taylor: this is outside the scope of the current understanding of GovStack

      • Pawel: outbound adaptors add complexity

      • Uwe: what is the ‘man in the middle’ and how would it work?

      • Pawel: this could function like an ESB

      • If there are scenarios where one BB communicates directly with another, what is the architecture?

        • Taylor: Workflow would help support these outbound transactions

  • Can an adaptor handle a complex (1:many) transaction, or do we need workflow?

  • What technologies could/should be used? API Gateway, custom code, other?

 

Identifying/highlighting standards

@Wes Brown

10 minutes

ID BB has called out some specific standards. How should we handle/approach?

Next steps/AOB

 

5 minutes

What should we prioritize?

Can we spin off small groups to work through specific tasks?

Action Items

All to review comments (on Confluence and GitBook) and mark which things need to be done for the 1.0 publication (Now) versus in the future (Next)
All to review the BB specification template and suggest changes (comments in GitBook is fine) so that we can make any required changes for Valeria (and others) to align the BB spec to