2022-11-25 - Weekly Update

Owned by Benjamin Balder Bach
Last updated: Dec 01, 2022 by Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
2 min read

Nov 25, 2022

About this document: Agenda and notes are kept in the same document, a separate copy of the document is maintained for each meeting. Please add agenda points before the meeting. Action items created in previous meeting and all other unresolved action items are kept in the document. Please tick off any completed items.

Meeting link: https://meet.google.com/rsf-cqaq-eyq

Attendees

  • @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) (meeting facilitator)

  • @Philippe Page (out)

  • @Lal Chandran (out)

  • @Benjamin Balder Bach (weekly note keep and time keeper)

  • @sasi

  • @PSRAMKUMAR (out)

  • @Maksim Ovtsinnikov (out)

Meeting Note

Agenda

Presenter

Discussion

Agenda

Presenter

Discussion

Action points from last week

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

 

Sprint status review

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

bb-consent Backlog

Reminders

  • Watch the GitBook trainings

  • Onboarding docs - do you have access to all platforms and the respective Consent project spaces? GitBook, GitHub, Slack, Jira, Confluence?

 

Schema updates

@Benjamin Balder Bach

Consolidates endpoints and schema with latest meetings on UC-Post-Partum-001-Registration_PostPartum_and_InfantCare by benjaoming · Pull Request #30 · GovStackWorkingGroup/bb-consent

GitBook “in review”

@Benjamin Balder Bach

https://app.gitbook.com/o/pxmRWOPoaU8fUAbbcrus/s/oEAfhW9JLP3tJ6mPyxtF/~/changes/p1bw20AJXTOKvYSTbwfT/ Lets review together as an example?

Gherkin scenario writing

all-hands

Can we hash out some .feature files with a set of (generic!) scenarios that are relevant to the MCC registration use-case?

(details can be added later)

Reference | Cucumber

We went through a Gherkin Feature that Ain is drafting.

PUSHED TO NEXT MEETING

Action Items

Prepare suggestion for adjustments to avoid Consent Records pending signatures needing to be stored in the system @Benjamin Balder Bach

Action Items from last meeting

Lay out question Consent Record state “paradox” and forward through @Lal Chandran - @Benjamin Balder Bach
Set up Monday meeting and invite@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
Presentation of API endpoints, mocks and tests for technical committee meeting Thursday @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
Move last 6 sprint issues migrated from GitHub to the backlog @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
Everyone: Read email forwarded from Jaume about new IMBB

 

Decision

  1. Everyone are highly encouraged to reach out to experts that could be interested in reviewing our specification.
  2. We agree to @sasi’s suggestion that Consent Records pending signature should not be stored in the system.
  3. We will need to adjust API endpoints, schemas and call sequences.