2022-10-25 - Weekly Update

Oct 25, 2022

About this document: Agenda and notes are kept in the same document, a separate copy of the document is maintained for each meeting. Please add agenda points before the meeting. Action items created in previous meeting and all other unresolved action items are kept in the document. Please tick off any completed items.

Meeting link: https://meet.google.com/kgd-xvgr-wxu

Attendees

  • @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) (meeting facilitator)

  • @Philippe Page

  • @Lal Chandran

  • @Benjamin Balder Bach (weekly note keep and time keeper)

  • @sasi

  • @PSRAMKUMAR

  • Maksim

Meeting Note

Agenda

Presenter

Discussion

Agenda

Presenter

Discussion

Intro of Maksim (new Consent BB group member)

Maksim

 

Follow-up on previous Action Items (Fixed)

Meeting facilitator

 

Gherkin intro (15 min)

@Benjamin Balder Bach

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Xi6kt8Bn25dw1DBygtQt4cnqhslmtE5db1Vr7HrTFLQ/edit?usp=sharing

Ad-hoc test strategy discussion

 

@PSRAMKUMAR objected to the focus on Gherkin and to spend time on preparing the workshop with Gherkin scenarios. Laid out different priorities for engaging with Testing Group. Consequently, the Gherkin intro was canceled.

Cybernetica product presentation (15 min)

Maksim

An introduction to the Content Management system that Maksim works with. The presentation was very brief in preparation for more directed questions on Friday.

Proposal for alignment with universal Mother-and-Child-Programme use-case as prepared by Satyajit (20 min)

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Ben and Ain will sync up to go through the API calls that are relevant to the universal registration workflow.

Next meeting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes from Maksim's presentation

Questions to be asked on Friday

Cybernetica’s solution is commercial. But it can be used to understand and compare with other DPGs. Solution is going through certification by Ukraine’s government.

“UXP” is commercial version of X-road = kind of information BB

Data owners = citizens, individuals

Protected service declaration, declared in UXP

Client has responsibility to request consent (please confirm)

A portal gives data owner’s option to manage all consent

Consent proxy - separates validation and access logging from the protected service

Next Friday: Going through a use-case, perhaps the Mother and Child use-case

Is the “Protected service declaration” the same as an Agreement or how do they compare?

Action Items

Set up the first automated stub-based API tests w/ Circle CI and pattern developed by Testing group @Benjamin Balder Bach

Action Items from last meeting

 

Decision