2023-11-20 Sprint Review

 Date

Nov 20, 2023

 Participants

@Valentin Filyov @Nico Lueck @Oleksii Danyliuk @Artun Gürkan @Vladislav Todorov @jarkkohyoty @Vasil Kolev @Wes Brown @Priit Puru

Recording:

 Review topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Agenda

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Agenda

Notes

10 mins

OPB improvements
Highschool certificate prototype

@Artun Gürkan

HSC- 1 version from review and will be published shortly.

@Artun Gürkan gave walk throug prototype (mobile 1 st approach). First feedback roud was executed internally and adjustmens were done accordingly.
Yolanda`ś team has now feedback.
GovSprint Idea investigating
@Jonas Bergmeier worked on Women in Tech topic

10 mins

Consent BB integration pathway

@Oleksii Danyliuk @Valentin Filyov

Next step of DIY evolution and local development:
Configure OpenIMIS and Consent as BB and emulators. Updated documentation

There has been modification at USCT deployment - there is an added configurable mode for choosing which mode deployment should use ( emulated setup or interaction with real BB-s )For Consent integration has been created readiness for try out consent API conformity and quick test against http://iGrant.io testing environment.

5 min

Sandbox architecure improvements

@jarkkohyoty

USCT authentication changes
Pre-authentication for Govstack accessing Govstack BB-s admin UI-s

 

5 min

RPC backend in action

@Vladislav Todorov

New Bulk endpoints added

Autogenerated users

Initialised successful integration with RPC FE

Pending deployment of the new Version in EKS cluster

 

10 min

Documentation enchantments

 

For next sprint planning, check again Sandbox Targets 2023archived

Thus items should be taken into the next sprint

  1. Instruction how to build the full stack system with BB implementations, not only USCT DIY Package

  2. GovStack Internally: How to add new BB (with own use case UI, not part of USCT). Requirements to Open up Sandbox for additional BB

3 min

Any relevant feedback/ comments to aligne Govstack next realease Q42023

@Wes Brown

If there are any feedback toward documentation / how the documentation enchansments should happen after documentation release? Any comments you see relevant.

 

5 min

Conference feedback

@Nico Lueck

DPGA Annual Conference

Overall feedback was positive

 Action items

 Decisions