Product Use Cases for Sandbox | @Nico Lueck | 15 min | Looking for 2-3 product use cases which: Has an owner Uses as many BB as possible Have interconnections Showcase the potentially broad impact the GovStack approach can have Involves payment aspects (good cross-cutting BB) Shared DPIs
Use a core registry birth, business, patient, etc
Political/DC prioriitiy sectors ie - Social Protection, Gender, Climate
Needed BB existing in Sandbox
Potential Product Use Cases: Maternal and Newborn Health Unconditional Social Benefits Transfer (Ramkumar) Market Linkage (Sarah) Remote Learning (Sarah) Ukraine Drivers License (Ramkumar) Enterprise Registration for Customs (Ramkumar) DIGIT Use cases (e.g. Water and Sewerage Management) Gofore Finnish/Estonian Use Case (tbd) G2P Use case (Hani)
Discussion Hani G2P Use Case - Unconditional Social Benefits Transfer DIGIT - Online Building Plan Approval System Fits requirements except 5 Is something that is needed for country implementation anyway This will be discussed later this week (recording to be shared by Hani)
Rwanda - Enterprise Resource Responsibility These may help with any co:develop partnership
Jake Wesley First set to start with, for example for test data and UI Balance goals of sandbox between showcase fast and build fundamental structure for deployment,…
Jaume Taylor From the chat “From my perspective, the big bet we're making (and the potentially high-value thing we've done but not yet proved via reusable deployment and test tooling) is that governments will be able to do better digital transformation by (1) following an IM-pattern (2) ensuring that all candidate applications which play the role of BBs (3) can be deployed to meet a specific, shared API specification. That's (1) architecture, (2) apis, (3) containerized deployment & configurability. Those 3 are the "govstack requirements", they're the "govstack method". We should create the tooling that allows us to do deployments that follow those requirements, and then we will later be able to change out specific candidates and configure them in different ways, while they still meet the 1-2-3 specs.” Also in chat “there are different buckets here. one lives in the bb repos: adapt DPGs to govstack APIs ensure deployable and configurable configure for api test case configure for use-case-x configure for use-case-y
when that's done (and we still need Gofore here) then we get into the deployment-tooling repo: select high level use case (e.g., use-case-x) select bb candidates (ensure that they're configured and deployed according to use-case-x)”
From chat “one more thought: gofore does NOT need to see a user story like this right now: "as a MoH it staff i want to enable ppic registration across three bbs so i can reduce loss to followup" instead, they need clear user stories like this: as an IT minister in ghana I want to be able to select 3 govstack-compliant applications and deploy them with a particular use-case configuration so that i can understand Govstack and consider using the methodology in my own digital transformation"
Jake We seem to be aligned on the Sandbox work, just from different perspectives Advocates for cloning app repos and standing up apps quickly to enable the sandbox dev
Proposed Product Use Cases |
Compliance Process Working Group | @Moritz Fromageot | 5 min | Context: In Ukraine, GIZ is looking to propose a GovStack “compliant” solution. Looking to help define what “compliant” means and how that process would work Jake: Ingmar already started working on this. Specific feedback on the Ukraine solution is that it has some work to be ready to go Hani: Max has alreadly started some work on this, so we should involve him. Also includes levels of compliance
Proposed WG Max Taylor Ingmar Satya Wes Steve Mortiz Nico Ramkumar
|