Action points from last week

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Updates from TC meeting

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Feedback on Compliance Concept and Integration. Scenarios (link to Confluence page) (by Digit). Any impact on our API development?

Feedback on “Architecture and Non-Functional Requirement” document (link in GitBook). A dedicated team is looking for volunteers to work on it over next 2 months.

Tech Committee action items to all wave 1&2 BBs.

New UX for compliance of API testing has been presented. We will go over it in another meeting.

• Feedback and remarks to send back.

• What metrics for compliance comparison to Consent BB?

Gherkin scenario

@Benjamin Balder Bach @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)

Status update based on scenario drafting document: https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/120946795

Consent BB Spec 2.0 planning

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) @sasi

Must move forward with next version of spec. First task: identify reference usecases

• Unconditional Social Cash Transfer as the next use-case proposed by Product Team

• Other potential sources for real world use-cases

• Sasi may add more here from his experience

• Ramkumar: There aren’t any GovStack-wide administrative use-cases. We can build up to this. It’s an overarching layer that has not been done yet, but it will come. Work is done with a blueprint for templetizing use-cases. Wes is writing this. This use-case template contains examples that reference scenarios that can be administrative functions. We can already start capturing these scenarios.
  Layer 1: Basic use case documents (cross-BB)
  Layer 2: Use case scenario definitions (BB)
  Layer 3: BB specifications (API, Gherkin etc)

• To align with Ramkumar’s description of the state of affairs, we can start to deliver specifications for administrative practices by defining scenarios.

Tenders:

• There might be additional features for tenders/applications that can add 20% to their score.

• We should look at our own reference with the eyes of the tenders.

• If a vendor discovers gaps in the specification, they are free to suggest and can get a boost in their score.

“Consent management” definition

@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated)
pushed to next meeting

We renamed “Consent Management BB” to “Consent BB”. Is there a useful definition of “consent management” that we can apply?

AOB

all hands

New potential member(s) to Consent BB

Consent BB tender out around end of January