May 11, 2023 Technical Committee Meeting Note
Attendees
@Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) @David Higgins @Laurence Berry @Dominika Bieńkowska (Deactivated) @Aleksander Reitsakas @Kibuuka, Arnold @Taylor Downs @Karolina Kopacz (Deactivated) @Sarah Farooqi @Mauree, Venkatesen @Rachel Lawson (Unlicensed) @Valeria Tafoya Michal Dulko
Agenda | Presenter | Duration | Discussion |
Review pending action items | @Esther Ogunjimi | 10 minutes
| TECH-654: Updates based on technical reviewDone
|
Status update | BB Leads | 30 minutes
| Scrum standup-style (what we did this week; plans for next week; blockers/pain points and open/unresolved questions?
TECH-615: Building Block Alignment to Template for 1.0 PublicationDone
|
How to define BBs consent service build in for discussion | @Ain Aaviksoo (Deactivated) | 15 Minutes
| The whole idea of GovStack is that discrete functions are maintained in separate BB-s and not lumped into super-BB’s
|
Identity BB APIs For decision | @Dominika Bieńkowska (Deactivated) | 15 minutes
| Some are dependent on UI and cannot be tested. How should we move forward? Having issues with wallet and regarding tokens which should be set in the cookies; there is no assurance it will work with other software. Taylor - recommending to hard code random value and wait on the candidate to come along, then the test can be modified. Rachel - change the test, does that mean we also need a small amendment to the spec? Dominika - it can be both ways; once spec is updated, and also update test. |
AOB | @Rachel Lawson (Unlicensed) |
| https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/l/cp/1KwtHyMc All BB Leads to read and add comments |
Meeting recording
Action items
TECH-665: TC action item - 11.05.23Done
Decisions
- Hard code for ID BB API testing. Thank you @Taylor Downs suggesting this