2023-04-05 - Product Committee
Date
Apr 5, 2023
Participants
@Wes Brown
@Sarah Farooqi
@Sainabou Jallow
@Esther Ogunjimi
@Dominika Bieńkowska (Deactivated)
@Martinez, Yolanda (Deactivated)
@Meelis Zujev (Deactivated)
@Farina Owusu
@PSRAMKUMAR
@Rachel Lawson (Unlicensed)
@Taylor Downs
@Shukla, Ayush
@Margus Mägi
@Sherman Kong
Meeting Recording
Recording URL: Product Committee Meetings-20230405_090430-Meeting Recording.mp4
Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Review Action Items |
| 5 min |
|
Digital Impact Exchange Update | @Sarah Farooqi | 5 min |
|
Attributing Contributors | @Sainabou Jallow | 15 min | What factors do we use to determine who is listed as a contributor to a Use Case (and more generally)? Are there any established standards for this? Option 1 To be listed as a contributor, one of the following criteria must be met:
Guideline:
Option 2 Follow existing standard for recognizing all contributions to a research out - the Contributor Roles Taxonomy CRediT. CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) is a high-level taxonomy, including 14 roles, that can be used to represent the roles typically played by contributors to research output. ** Many journals and publishers have adopted the CRediT system in their submission process. The model allows contributors to share a description of their input, using 14 pre-defined contributor roles: 1. conceptualization; 2. data curation; 3. formal analysis; 4. funding acquisition; 5. investigation; 6. methodology; 7. project administration; 8. resources; 9. software; 10. supervision; 11. validation; 12. visualization; 13. writing – original draft; 14. writing – review & editing. Guideline:
Example: A.T.K.: conceptualization (lead), data curation (lead), formal analysis (lead), investigation, methodology (lead), project administration (lead), resources (lead), visualization, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing (equal); D.R.: conceptualization (supporting), formal analysis (supporting), methodology (supporting), resources (supporting), supervision (supporting), validation and writing—review and editing (supporting); H.R.: conceptualization (supporting), data curation (supporting), project administration (supporting), validation and writing—review and editing (supporting) Discussion:
Next Steps:
|
Priority Use Case Sectors | @Wes Brown | 15 min |
|
Meeting Note Rotation |
|
| GIZ, Estonia, Dial, ITU |
Action items
Decisions
- Contributors will be listed alphabetically with no groupings