2023-10-17 - Product Committee

Date

Oct 17, 2023

 Participants

  • @PSRAMKUMAR

  • @Sainabou Jallow

  • @Margus Mägi

  • @Steve Conrad

  • @Valeria Tafoya

  • @Rachel Lawson (Unlicensed)

  • @Wes Brown

Meeting Recording

Recording URL:

 Discussion topics

Item

Presenter

Time

Notes

Item

Presenter

Time

Notes

Review Action Items

 

5 min

 

Inclusive Rural Advisory Service for Farmers

@Sainabou Jallow

20 min

Use Case: https://app.gitbook.com/o/pxmRWOPoaU8fUAbbcrus/s/YLLEfCKTnmzAMDSDzJJH/use-cases/agr-1-market-linkage-1

Comments

  • Margus: Is this a high-value use case in the Ag sector?

    • Steve: Worked with GIZ and UNDP and identified that there are/were 5 core use cases, this was one of them

  • Ramkumar: Supporting story about how this sector can impact individual citizens

    • Aspects of this use case may involve more individual manual involvement (e.g. people going out to visit farmers)

    • Will connect with contact who has experience in this sector

    • From the comments: Some services that can be added targeting the farmer:  online inspection and advice, supply chain info, storage, waste recycling, contract services like tilling, harvesting, transport, irrigation,etc

Post-23Q3 Roadmap

@Wes Brown

15 min

https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/111771696

https://govstack-global.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GH/pages/349306894 (In Progress)

Feedback

  • Ramkumar: Suggestion to create a “citizen portal” for entry in to GovStack

  • Steve: Need to ensure that there is clarity on any new BBs

  • Margus: Also need to consider adapting existing BBs into smaller BBs (decomposing them) or extracting “use case” content from them (“some of the current BBs seem more like a use case”). BBs with a smaller scope may increase the potential providers that can satisfy the specification

  • Rachel: We need to create a use case prior to starting work on any new BBs

  • Ramkumar: We have defined a layered approach to BBs but this isn’t consistently referenced in our work or in the BBs themselves. It may be helpful to formalize this concept

  • Margus: Do we have an cabinet use case? Are we confusing use cases with build blocks?

Ideas:

  • Service blocks, interaction between BBs and other architecture levels

  • Spec review incl. external feedback

  • Application of specs for procurement purposes, describe procurement support options

  • Review structure and target of specs, set expectations correctly

  • Service blocks and connecting them to the specs

Not Discussed

 

 

 

Use Case Template

@Wes Brown

10 min

Current Template: https://app.gitbook.com/o/pxmRWOPoaU8fUAbbcrus/s/YLLEfCKTnmzAMDSDzJJH/use-cases/less-than-use-case-template-greater-than

Changes to Product Committee

@Wes Brown

10 min

Proposed Agenda:

  • Selected Team Updates (2-3 teams per meeting)

    • Status update, active tasks, questions/comments

  • General Project Discussions

    • Discussions about priorities, processes, and concerns

    •  

Next Meeting

 

 

  • Discuss the eMarketplace building block and how to include it in the Market Linkage use case

  • Discuss working on a procurement platform reference use case

Meeting Note Rotation

 

 

GIZ, Estonia, Dial (filling for ITU), ITU (skipped previous week)

 Action items

@Wes Brown to schedule time with @Vikash Madduri to discuss BB Provider Contracts and code location/maintenance (post-delivery)
@all review the use case template in next weeks meeting